Summarising a Scientific Journal Literature review

Summarising a Scientific Journal - Literature review ExampleTheoretic everyy, this complexity and variation in conclusions implies that parameters used in achieving mixing quality will not always be individual but inversely related to each other (Wolfgang et al., 1999). Practically, all laboratory experimenter be admonished to be real watchful in guiding the fluid mixers in order to achieve uniform outflow of small channels. Major Findings Results are in three sections though they all centre round mixing quality. On mixing quality and loss pressure, results revealed that in the presence of large range of intensity level flow, there is lean of quality mixing can be achieved if the conditions of proper combination of slit and micro channels are adhered to. This implies that experimenters must be proactive in their choice of micro channel selection. Similarly, Hessel et al. (2005) point out that quality mixing can be accomplished by time-pulsing flow owing to a periodical deepe n of pumping. On the parallelization of mixing elements, results showed that reactants achieve high volume flow when channel depths are increased in a single mixing unit. This implies that when using one single mixing unit, parallelization of mixing which ensures increased volume flow in specified regions of 700mL/h cannot be realized. On the actual volume flow as it relates to quality mixing, the results showed that there could be deviations on the volume flow depending on the mixer array. This assertion is however disagreed by Omega (1995) who posits that in a fully laminar system, there is supposed to be invariant mixing quality whenever mixing is done over an entire flow range. Weaknesses and Strengths In the methodology, what was supposed to be an experimentation ended up using too many secondary info and comparative assumptions. For casing instead of the researchers monitoring the mixing time, they stated, the mixing time cannot be directly measured by the evidence react ion. Instead a comparison was made for mixing elements having various channel widths. It will be noteworthy that any element of mixing is highly important in the results achieved in any micro-mixers experiment. However, the researchers choose comparative assumption. On the use of secondary data, it is admitted that secondary data helps in devising qualitative analysis of data highly valid however in the actual collection of data, it is important that there is a bill drawn between primary data collection and secondary data collection. If for nothing at all, the researchers could contain different sections of their project report, depicting these two variations. The research report has a number of strengths. For instance the manifestation of data was very vivid amidst the use of diagrams and figures to elaborate all points. Again, the entire report was well segmented, making the use of the document very easy to follow. For instance the researchers used sub-topics to differentiate new ideas. Suggestions The beauty of all research work is that they are a continuous process. This means that there is always room for forward motion and advancement. To this end, some few suggestions are made towards the future improvement of the research work. It is suggested that future researches should make clearer notation on active and passive mixing principles. This suggestion is given against the backdrop that whenever active and passive principles are used, researchers always have the chance of considering expanded scopes of